A
version of this review appeared in The
Age,
April 14, 2012.
Though
he ranks among the greatest British film directors, Terence Davies
has only been allowed to make a handful of movies: something in his
work scares investors, perhaps the way its extreme beauty is accompanied
by so much pain. Set in London a few years after World War Two,
his devastating new adaptation of a 1952 play by Terence Rattigan begins
at a bombed-out patch of waste ground, for him an apt image
of the human heart.
From
this point on, Davies explodes his source material into fragments of
memory drifting through the mind of his heroine Lady Hester (Rachel
Weisz), who has recently left her fuddy-duddy husband (Simon Russell
Beale) for the younger Freddy (Tom Hiddleton), a RAF pilot turned
louche man-about-town, moving into a couple of dingy rooms in a
boarding house adjacent to the bomb site.
“Beware
of passion,” warns Hester's gargoyle of a mother-in-law (Barbara
Jefford) in flashback. “It always leads to something ugly.”
Aided by a trio of resourceful stars, Davies undertakes to show
us various kinds of potentially ugly passion burning beneath his
characters' stiff British facades. Weisz often seems to be
smiling through suppressed tears, maintaining a “brave face” that
conceals nothing; Hiddleston is a boggle-eyed Bertie Wooster, furious
to be carried so far out of his depth.
Rattigan's
dialogue makes clear that Hester's love for Freddy is essentially
physical, a mildly “daring” notion in its day, and one that
Davies impresses on us with memorable economy in a few shots of the
couple in bed. But perhaps more deeply still, she craves the
sense of being truly alive – and so she embraces the drama of
adultery much as Freddy yearns for the excitement of the war.
Desolate
as his vision tends to be, Davies has never lost faith in the special
form of cinematic pleasure exemplified by the Hollywood of the 1950s,
where music, lighting, charismatic actors and elaborately
choreographed camera movements all combine to express feeling in a
direct and forceful way. His dissolves in particular give the
seductive impression of sinking into a sorrowful dream; The
Deep Blue Sea
is unabashedly a “weepie,” and Davies knows better that most that
nothing is more indulgent than a good cry.
This
impression of paradoxical luxury extends across the entire film,
despite the austere handling of the long dialogue scenes taken
directly from Rattigan, where actors stand in the shadows and address
each other solemnly as if on an empty stage. Such stillness puts
enormous weight on every nuance of expression and every carefully
chosen sound: creaking footsteps, the ticking of a clock, the cries
of children in the street. At its height of intensity, this
formalised style reaches a pitch that demands comparison not with
Hollywood but with Carl Dreyer's masterpiece Gertrud (1964),
another portrait of a woman determined to sacrifice everything for
love.
It
has sometimes been suggested that Rattigan's play is a veiled
treatment of his own homosexuality, but rather than delve into any
supposed “gay subtext” Davies conveys something far more
remarkable, a sense
that the feelings being explored are beyond gender: that a similar
story could be told about a love affair between a married man and a
younger woman, or between two women or two men.
Not
only beyond gender, but beyond class, too. Davies' most radical
additions to the play draw on collective rather than individual
memory: the film finds its climax in a wartime flashback condensed
into one extraordinary tracking shot, as Londoners from all
backgrounds join in a chorus of “Cockles and Mussels” like a
charm against the dark.
For
all its historical and cultural specificity – or because of this –
the film gives a notion of what might be meant by that difficult term
“universal”. It is not foolish to compare Hester's private
agony with the devastation wrought by the bombs: both, after all, are
matters of life and death. Still, each of her neighbours could
have lived through as much or more. The horror and the
consolation is that no-one has to suffer alone.

No comments:
Post a Comment