A
version of this article appeared in The
Age,
May 31, 2012.
Popular wisdom holds that all comics long to be musicians. In Woody
Allen's case, we know it's true: he may have directed more than forty
movies, but he's told plenty of interviewers over the years that jazz
is his greatest passion. Famously, he's never let anything, even the
Academy Awards, get in the way of his Monday night gig playing
clarinet as part of an ensemble. By his own account it's a comfort
thing, a relief from the anxieties about sex, death and the absence
of God that spark most of his jokes. If Woody were Californian,
maybe he'd meditate or go surfing – but he's
an old-school New Yorker, so for him it's jazz. “There's nothing
between you and the pure feeling of what you're playing,” he
explains in the 1997 documentary Wild Man Blues. “There's no
cerebral element to it at all.”
It
makes sense that a new documentary on Allen should screen as part of
the Melbourne International Jazz Festival, along with two of his best
films from the 1990s. But what does jazz really mean for him –
in particular, the kind of ultra-traditional Dixieland jazz that was
archaic even in his youth? There's inarguably a gap
between Allen and his cultural heroes; notoriously, his movie
universe is one where African-Americans play little or no visible
role. Still, something in his temperament responds to the brisk
vitality of this music, permitting improvisation within firm bounds.
Just as jazz has its “standards”, Allen's scripts are
typically riffs on cultural commonplaces, the way that his recent hit
Midnight
in Paris
takes our received ideas of Picasso or Hemingway and subjects them to
respectful teasing. A jazz influence can be felt, too, in the
handling of language which has always been Allen's greatest strength:
his comic monologues have their own variety of music, where the
patented stammerings and stumblings define the syncopated rhythm.
At
his best, Allen can take even the most familiar jazz-influenced
compositions and make them his own. No Allen fan can hear the
clarinet glissando that opens “Rhapsody In Blue” without remembering
the shots of the New York skyline at the start of Manhattan
(1979). The impact here springs from the three-way tension between
music, image, and Allen's stop-start voiceover narration, supposedly
a series of discarded beginnings to a novel. “For him, this was
still a town that
existed in black and white and pulsated to the great tunes of George
Gershwin.” Instantly, a space opens up between the film's apparent
subject-matter – a very 1970s comedy of shifting, regretful
relationships – and a much older dream of the excitement of the
city.
So
many of Allen's films play on that gap between banal everyday life
and the realm of the imagination: the fantasy version of the 1920s in
Midnight
In Paris,
the glamour conjured up by the movies in The
Purple Rose of Cairo
(1985) or over the wireless in Radio
Days
(1987). Yet few of his characters manage to break through permanently
to the promised land which music seems to inhabit. Tellingly, his
single attempt at a full-scale musical, Everyone
Says I Love You
(1997), is a near-total failure – though it does contain the
uniquely touching scene where Allen himself sings “I'm Through With
Love” in a thin, quavering voice, staring at the floor as if he
feared revealing some intimate secret.
A
comparable, still more memorable scene occurs at the end of Sweet
and Lowdown
(1999), presented as a biography of the imaginary 1930s jazz
guitarist Emmet Ray (Sean Penn), a crude but gifted fellow plainly
conceived by Allen as a displaced self-portrait. After a lifetime of
selfishness, Emmet realises that he's lost his one true love
(Samantha Morton). To console himself, he picks up his guitar
and once more begins to play. Smirking dreamily and waving his head
like an orchestra conductor, Penn in close-up conveys an
extraordinary range of nearly intangible feelings – innocent bliss,
a vulgar delight in mastery, rueful amusement at his unwilling depth
of emotion.
“Can
we go now?” screeches Emmett's latest girlfriend (Gretchen Mol),
the moment the piece is done. The comic pathos stems not only
from her philistine attitude – we know there's no way this couple
can last – but from our sense that no-one will ever hear quite what
Emmet does, in this particular music.

No comments:
Post a Comment