A
version of this review appeared in The
Age, June
23, 2012.
The
new film from Russian director Andrey Zvyagintsev begins with a
striking, pregnant image: a bird perched on a bare tree at dawn, just
outside a Moscow apartment block. As the sun rises, the camera
holds for a long moment – and eventually, a second bird flutters
into shot. Indoors, a middle-aged woman later identified as
Elena (Nadezhda Markina) pulls on a nightgown and sits on an ottoman
in front of her bedroom mirror. She rubs her eyes, looks
briefly puzzled, then turns her head almost flirtatiously, as if to
confirm that she's still the same person as before.
While she goes about her routines – preparing breakfast, waking up her
husband Vladimir (Andrey Smirnov) – light filters through the
curtains and gleams from every surface of the modernist, open-plan
apartment, neat and spotless in a way that speaks of constant,
tireless labour. Shot by Zvyaginsev's regular cinematographer
Mikhail Krichman – who also worked on the recent, gorgeous-looking
Silent Souls – the images seem to sanctify Elena's mundane
tasks, transforming them into rituals of devotion.
A
former nurse, Elena is the second wife of the elderly Vladimir, who
first met her a decade earlier during a stay in hospital. It's
a functional if unequal partnership, where she serves him as carer
and housekeeper as well as lover. Their main quarrels are over their
respective adult children: Katya (Elena Lyadova), Vladimir's cynical
daughter, and Sergey (Aleksey Rozin), Elena's unemployed dolt of a
son, who lives with his equally wretched family in a less salubrious
apartment opposite a nuclear power plant on the other side of town.
Using his mother as a go-between, Sergey regularly begs for
handouts from his wealthy stepfather; when Vladimir refuses to
provide beyond a certain point, Elena has to decide where her
ultimate loyalties lie.
Zvyaginsev
is a talented filmmaker and this is his best film yet, less mired in
vague allegory than The Return (2003) or The Banishment
(2007). For all his self-conscious austerity he has become a
impressively suave storyteller, with a novelist's command of detail
and a deft way of shifting between perspectives while keeping us
guessing about his characters' motives. Indeed, the longer we look at
Elena's sublimely ordinary face, the harder it is to know what lies
beneath. Tenderness? Resignation? Suppressed rage?
Significantly, she's the only character who shows any trace of a
religious impulse, though when she enters a church she seems
uncertain how to pray; gazing up at an icon preserved behind glass,
she's confronted yet again by her own reflection.
Though
technically a crime story, Elena is
only marginally a thriller (Philip Glass' string-heavy score
telegraphs “suspense” in a deliberately repetitive, unmodulated
way). Rather, the film demands to be interpreted as a report
on the condition of modern Russia, where the rich and the poor are
separate nations and only a few ambassadors, like Elena, are licensed
to travel back and forth. Politically speaking, Zvyagintsev
and his writer Oleg Negin don't play favorites, ensuring that no-one
wins our easy sympathy; the plot has a neat cruelty that recalls
Michael Haneke, especially in one bleakly absurd sequence near the
end. Also reminiscent of Haneke is an underlying puritanism
especially evident in the view of popular media: TV is a
mindlessly chattering presence in the homes of Elena and Sergey
alike, while another character's fondness for violent video games is
understood as a further symptom of social collapse.
Yet
the tone remains very different from Haneke's schoolmasterly chill.
Again, this has to do with Zvyaginsev's lyricism, his awareness
of the mysterious beauty in all things, even the smoke that billows
from the nuclear cooling towers at sunset. Though the natural
world seems deep in autumnal decay, we know that in spring the leaves
will be green once more; moral desolation is balanced by a grudging
respect for life's incredible persistence, its desire to renew itself
at any price.

No comments:
Post a Comment