A version of this review appeared in
The Age, July
28, 2012.
If
Steven Soderbergh makes good on his frequent threats to retire, it's
hard to imagine who could fill his shoes. Nobody else in Hollywood
has the bravado – or perhaps the desire – to keep making these
flippant, weirdly distanced art movies, which resist the convention
of a sympathetic hero who wins the day. Even in the rousing
action-thriller Haywire, the kickboxer Gina Carano is less a
personality than an abstract force: in a sense, the subject of the
film is simply her running battle to take control of her own
narrative.
Though Magic Mike is
Soderbergh's most relaxed, accessible film in ages, the hero
(Channing Tatum) is another of his lab rats – assigned certain
strengths and attractions, then released into a controlled
environment to see how he fares. Again, the character is slightly
displaced from the centre of his own movie: in the early scenes, Mike
is simply the old hand who inducts the 19-year-old Kid (Alex
Pettyfer) into the shadowy world of male striptease. Later, the
spotlight falls on Matthew McConaughey's hilariously flashy
performance as Dallas, the manager of the Florida club where the boys
do their thing: half preacher, half pimp, and all Texas smarm.
By contrast, Tatum's star aura springs
from the laidback, crafty way he deploys his meathead jock persona.
Only gradually do we perceive Mike's vulnerability: hoping to be
recognised as more than just a pretty face and a six-pack, he
describes himself as an “entrepreneur” and dreams of marketing
his own line of custom-made furniture (the most dubious
follow-your-dream subplot since Anna Faris' awful sculptures in
What's Your Number?).
The film plays Mike's “tragedy” for
both pathos and laughs, skirting the misogynist implication that men
are automatically degraded when they become professional objects of
the female gaze. Splitting the difference between the two meanings
of “burlesque,” the strip numbers resemble drag acts, in which
traditional macho symbols – uniforms, pistols, bulging crotches –
are made lewdly comic rather than seriously seductive.
Soderbergh tries to get a bit of
documentary reality into each of his projects, if only to generate
the friction that lets his creativity spark. In Haywire, he
ensured Careno had plenty of opportunity to display her martial arts
skills; here, he goes out of his way to prove that Tatum – a former
stripper in real life – is doing all his own dance routines. In
both cases, the action sequences are often shot from a distance with
the camera locked into position, so the wide screen resembles a
squash court where the performers bounce off the walls.
It is tempting to see Magic Mike as
two films in one: the first a crowd-pleasing dramedy about a lovable
loser, the second a chance for Soderbergh to amuse himself with
surprising visual choices and transitions between scenes (as usual,
he serves as his own cinematographer and editor, crediting himself
under different names). While Mike and company strut their stuff to
crowds of whooping women, the film avoids seeming either thrilled or
repulsed by their desperate salesmanship; if an attitude to the
subject-matter is implied, it has to be deduced from this apparent
detachment.
Like Soderbergh's The Girlfriend
Experience (2009), Magic Mike is ultimately less about
sexuality in particular than about capitalism in general. For all
the perks of the hedonistic stripper lifestyle, there's an
unbridgeable class gap between Mike and his lover Joanna (Olivia
Munn) a psychology student completing her college degree. Chump that
he is, Mike views his carefully maintained body as a solid business
asset; similarly, he longs to establish an authentic identity by
building tables and chairs with his own hands. Though Soderbergh has
his own kind of pride in his craft, he treats such nostalgia for
“substance” with relentless irony. He's happy to stay on the
surface of the image, grooving on the multiple focal points and the
flashing lights.

No comments:
Post a Comment