A
version of this review appeared in The Age,
June 30, 2012.
I've
rarely laughed at the original Three Stooges shorts – there
are nearly 200 of them, made between the 1930s and the 1950s – but
the idea of a blow-by-blow recreation has a certain moronic beauty.
A dream project for Peter and Bobby Farrelly (who gave us Dumb
and Dumber) this feature-length tribute is both utterly
transparent and weirder than anything else in multiplexes at present.
Though
all three Stooges fall into the category “idiot man-child” it's
possible to distinguish between them. Curly, played here by
Will Sasso, is the burly one with the squeaky voice, Larry (Sean
Hayes) is the sensitive soul with curly hair, and Moe (Chris
Diamantopoulos) is the bully who dominates the other two.
In
the origin story devised by the Farrellys, the trio are introduced as
foundlings – played by three of the dopiest-looking babies you'll
ever see – who grow up under the care of the devoted Mother
Superior (Jane Lynch) and her fearsome sidekick Sister Mary Mengele
(Larry David). When the orphanage is threatened, they set off
into the world, older but no wiser, vowing to raise the cash to save
the day.
Ninety
minutes of unassuming family entertainment, the new Stooges is
also one of popular cinema's most extreme conceptual exercises since
Gus van Sant's shot-by-shot remake of Psycho (1998). The
film may be only half as funny as, say, Sasha Baron Cohen's The
Dictator, but it's far more focused; any chance for humour that
doesn't fit the Stooge universe is scrupulously passed over.
In
itself, Stooge comedy is intensely ritualised: the slaps and
eye-pokes accompanied by stylised sound effects, the puns and
malapropisms, the unified reactions to external stimulii (asked to
pose for a photo, the three leap merrily into each others' arms). The
new film faithfully imitates all this, along with many incidental
aspects of its source material: the jocular music, the punning
episode titles, and the one-dimensional acting required of the
support players – stooges for the Stooges – who have the task of
setting up the gags.
The
stars are all expert but not equally persuasive: Diamantopoulos, a
good-looking Broadway actor, is not really lumpen enough, and Hayes,
who'd make a perfect Cowardly Lion, is a bit too mournfully
expressive. Sasso achieves something closer to genuine idiocy –
there's no indication of a mind at work behind the cheerful,
jabbering facade.
Anything
resembling visual ornament would be out of place here, and the plain
camera style which the Farrellys have honed over the years serves
them well (the key thing, as in the original shorts, is to have all
three Stooges on screen side by side). Yet the seemingly rambling script slowly reveals itself as a well-built box
where every scene advances the plot; it takes impressive craft to
pull that off and ensure that the Stooges are never on screen
for more than a few seconds without bopping each other.
The
issue of how far the material needs updating has to be managed with
great care. The mayhem remains bloodless and though the Farrellys
were once known as kings of the gross-out, a set-piece involving a
hospital ward full of incontinent babies feels slightly misjudged.
On the other hand, much of the fun arises from seeing the
Stooges tackle the stupidities of the 21st century, with jokes about
Facebook (“Poke me”) the Kardashians and Jersey Shore.
American
reviewers have noted that the Farrellys, who come from Irish Catholic
stock, have erased all trace of their heroes' Jewish origins. But
doesn't Stooge humour belong to everybody? On one level, the Stooges
seem like products of a Depression-era immigrant melting pot; on
another, they're simply obnoxious kids whose running battles will be
familiar to anybody who recalls travelling with siblings in the back
of a car.
There's
an innocence not only to the project but to the Farrellys themselves
– probably the only Hollywood comedy directors now working who can
wring pathos from the plight of a sick child without irony. The film
stands in all humility as an authentic act of devotion; in God's
eyes, the Farrellys would have us believe, even Stooges are worthy of
love.

No comments:
Post a Comment