A
version of this review appeared in The Age,
September 1, 2012.
Whether you see Wes Anderson as a
tender humanist or a supplier of sour-sweet candy for grown-ups, he
remains as eccentric and obsessive as any American filmmaker now
working. Certainly, he deserves to be ranked as a serious
artist – but serious about what? The puzzle persists in Moonrise
Kingdom, Anderson's outwardly straightforward seventh feature:
nothing could be more typical of his shifty methods than a love
story involving a pair of 12-year-olds, whose desperately sincere
feelings are automatically framed by an adult's ironic point of view.
The year is 1965; the setting is the
fictional island of New Penzance, off the coast of New England, where
the orphaned Sam (Jared Gilman) and the troubled Suzy (Kara Hayward)
meet backstage at the annual church production of Benjamin Britten's
children's opera Noye's Fludde. A connection is felt,
letters are exchanged – and next summer, Sam runs away from scout
camp and rows across the lake in his coonskin cap to reunite with his
true love. Together they head for the woods, following the old
Chickchaw Harvest Migration Trail towards the sea. Their
relationship develops slowly, with all the expected awkward gestures
and long pauses; meanwhile, the adults sound the alarm, and soon a
rescue mission is underway.
Anderson fans may feel they've seen
this all before. With his pedantic woodland knowledge and his
easel painting, Sam is another version of the nerdy yet enterprising schoolboy hero played
by Jason Schwartzman in Rushmore; Suzy, with her blue
eyeshadow and haughty stare, could be a cousin of Gwyneth Paltrow's
depressive Margot in The Royal Tenenbaums. For a while now,
it's been clear that Anderson is bent on constructing a private
mythology from one film to the next, returning to the same themes and
devices over and over; in this sense he qualifies as a
filmmaking dandy, albeit the anxious American kind, flaunting his
connoisseurship while yearning for the innocence that allows
children to soak up whatever culture lies close to hand. So
Britten and Hank Williams alternate on the soundtrack, while the
storyline seems to arise from a reverie where the Scholastic Book
Club mingles with the French New Wave.
Bucking the digital trend, Moonrise
Kingdom is shot on warm, grainy 16-milimetre film to look like a
slightly faded print of itself. All the same, Anderson's chilly control freak tendencies
are front and centre – not only in the meticulous art direction, but in the
lateral tracking shots and 90-degree whip-pans that carve the
landscape into manageable chunks, as with lines of latitude and
longitude on a map. Indeed, maps of New Penzance recur
throughout; wrapped in a long red coat like a storybook owl, Bob
Balaban plays a fourth-wall-breaking tour guide who explains the
geography of the island and other elements of the plot.
Though Anderson avoids the clichés
lesser filmmakers use as shorthand for the 1960s, many aspects of his
style evoke the era of youth rebellion. When he zooms in on his young lovers against a “primal” backdrop of rocks and sand, it's a
classic gesture of hippie cinema, straight out of Michelangelo
Antonioni's Zabriskie Point (1970). Yet the theme of
generational warfare receives typically ambivalent treatment: though
Sam and Suzy are determined to defy their respective guardians,
Edward Norton as an earnest scout leader and Bruce Willis as the
local sheriff rank among the most benign authority figures in the
Anderson oeuvre.
The fact is that leaders, hierarchies, merit badges and
so forth are intensely important to Anderson, not only as targets for
gentle mockery but as sources of structure and meaning in a
frightening world. Even at their most arbitrary, conventions
provide a way of avoiding the choice between the tame and the wild,
between comforting civilisation and longed-for violence – a
dichotomy basic to all his work and very close to the
surface here. What would happen if he cut loose from good taste and
dramatised his inner conflicts on a grander scale, even (or
especially) at the risk of scandal or embarrassment? Hidden under all
the whimsy might be some kind of full-blown romantic, if only he'd
stop apologising for his instincts with shy little jokes.

Yes, will Wes Anderson (along with Sofia Coppola and Tom Ford) be able to leave good taste behind? And will they still be of interest when they do? (Spike Jonze risked doing just that with Where the Wild Things Are, and was roundly condemned for it). It might be impossible for Anderson to have a character who honestly prefers Axl Rose to Francoise Hardy without being mocked.
ReplyDeleteI'm hoping that Coppola won't comfortably distance herself from the "white trash" in The Bling Ring, and that Leslie Mann won't be a total harpie along the lines of Kathleen Turner in The Virgin Suicides. But it's possible that the restriction of Coppola's style references is what gives her films their tension.
I can barely imagine Axl Rose rating a mention in a Wes Anderson film at all. Perhaps Sofia Coppola has a little more freedom in that way -- Elle Fanning babbling about Twilight in Somewhere makes the character seem appealingly unprecocious next to Anderson's kids. But they're both very emotionally cautious filmmakers, to the point where you wonder what exactly is being held back. It'll be interesting to see if Coppola's obsession with chastity persists in Bling Ring, a subject that seems potentially closer to Larry Clark.
ReplyDeleteThanks for commenting!